Here we list all publications and preprints of group members since 2012.
Complete publication lists of individual members can be found on the corresponding member homepages.

[ 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 ]


Journal Articles

  1. H. Poulsen Nautrup, N. Friis, and H. J. Briegel, Fault-tolerant interface between quantum memories and quantum processors, Nat. Commun. 8, 1321 (2017) [arXiv:1609.08062].

  2. A. A. Melnikov, A. Makmal, V. Dunjko, and H. J. Briegel, Projective simulation with generalization, Sci. Rep. 7, 14430 (2017) [arXiv:1504.02247].

  3. R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański, J. Czajkowski, and P. Sekatski, Adaptive quantum metrology under general Markovian noise, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041009 (2017) [arXiv:1704.06280].

  4. G. Gour, B. Kraus, and N. R. Wallach, Almost all multipartite qubit quantum states have trivial stabilizer, J. Math. Phys. 58, 092204 (2017) [arXiv:1609.01327].

  5. P. Sekatski, M. Skotiniotis, J. Kołodyński, and W. Dür, Quantum metrology with full and fast quantum control, Quantum 1, 27 (2017) [arXiv:1603.08944].

  6. P. Sekatski, B. Yadin, M.-O. Renou, W. Dür, N. Gisin, and F. Fröwis, General measure for macroscopic quantum states beyond "dead and alive", New J. Phys. (accepted, 2017) [arXiv:1704.02270].

  7. M. Zwerger, B. P. Lanyon, T. E. Northup, C. A. Muschik, W. Dür, and N. Sangouard, Quantum repeaters based on trapped ions with decoherence free subspace encoding, Quantum Sci. Technol. 2, 044001 (2017) [arXiv:1611.07779].

  8. A. Pirker, V. Dunjko, W. Dür, and H. J. Briegel, Entanglement generation secure against general attacks,  New J. Phys. 19, 113012 (2017) [arXiv:1610.01907].

  9. N. Friis, D. Orsucci, M. Skotiniotis, P. Sekatski, V. Dunjko, H. J. Briegel, and W. Dür, Flexible resources for quantum metrology, New J. Phys. 19, 063044 (2017) [arXiv:1610.09999].

  10. A. Pirker, J. Wallnöfer, H. J. Briegel, and W. Dür, Construction of optimal resources for concatenated quantum protocols, Phys. Rev. A 95, 062332 (2017) [arXiv:1612.09444].

  11. K. Ried, J.-P. W. MacLean, R. W. Spekkens, and K. J. Resch, Quantum to classical transitions in causal relations, Phys. Rev. A 95, 062102 (2017)  [arXiv:1707.06131].

  12. M. Hebenstreit, D. Alsina, J. I. Latorre, and B. Kraus, Compressed quantum computation using a remote five-qubit quantum computer, Phys. Rev. A 95, 052339 (2017) [arXiv:1701.02970].

  13. P. Sekatski, M. Skotiniotis, and W. Dür, Improved Sensing with a Single Qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 170801 (2017) [arXiv:1608.03778].

  14. A. Dodel, A. Mayinda, E. Oudot, A. Martin, P. Sekatski, J.-D. Bancal, and N. Sangouard, Proposal for witnessing non-classical light with the human eye, Quantum 1, 7 (2017) [arXiv:1611.08542].

  15. D. Sauerwein, C. Macchiavello, L. Maccone, and B. Kraus, Multipartite correlations in mutually unbiased bases, Phys. Rev. A 95, 042315 (2017)  [arXiv:1701.07412].

  16. M. Hebenstreit, B. Kraus, L. Ostermann, and H. Ritsch, Subradiance via Entanglement in Atoms with Several Independent Decay Channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 143602 (2017) [arXiv:1701.01471].

  17. N. Friis, S. Bulusu, and R. A. Bertlmann, Geometry of two-qubit states with negative conditional entropy, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50, 125301 (2017) [arXiv:1609.04144].

  18. C. Spee, J. I. de Vicente, D. Sauerwein, and B. Kraus, Entangled Pure State Transformations via Local Operations Assisted by Finitely Many Rounds of Classical Communication, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 040503 (2017) [arXiv:1606.04418].

  19. J. I. de Vicente, C. Spee, D. Sauerwein, and B. Kraus, Entanglement manipulation of multipartite pure states with finite rounds of classical communication, Phys. Rev. A 95, 012323 (2016) [arXiv:1607.05145].

  20. J. Wallnöfer and W. Dür, Measurement based quantum communication with resource states generated by entanglement purificationPhys. Rev. A 95, 012303 (2017) [arXiv:1609.05754].


  1. K. Ried, T. Müller, H. J. Briegel, Modelling collective motion based on the principle of agency, e-print arXiv: 1712.01334 [q-bio.PE] (2017).

  2. A. Pirker, M. Zwerger, V. Dunjko, H. J. Briegel, W. Dür, Simple proof of confidentiality for private quantum channels in noisy environments, e-print arXiv:1711.08897 [quant-ph] (2017).

  3. A. Pirker, J. Wallnöfer, and W. Dür, Modular architectures for secure quantum networks, e-print arXiv:1711.02606 [quant-ph] (2017).

  4. T. Sriarunothai, G. S. Giri, S. Wölk, and C. Wunderlich, Radio-frequency sideband cooling and sympathetic cooling of trapped ions in a static magnetic field gradient, e-print arXiv:1710.09241 [quant-ph] (2017).

  5. M. Hebenstreit, M. Gachechiladze, O. Gühne, and B. Kraus, The Entanglement Hierarchy 2 × m × n Systems, e-print arXiv:1710.00981 [quant-ph] (2017).

  6. V. Dunjko and H. J. Briegel, Machine learning & artificial intelligence in the quantum domain, e-print arXiv:1709.02779 [quant-ph] (2017).

  7. T. Sriarunothai, S. Wölk, G. S. Giri, N. Friis, V. Dunjko, H. J. Briegel, and C. Wunderlich, Speeding-up the decision making of a learning agent using an ion trap quantum processor, e-print arXiv:1709.01366 [quant-ph] (2017).

  8. R. H. Jonsson, K. Ried, E. Martín-Martínez, and A. Kempf, Broadcasting qubits through relativistic fields, e-print arXiv:1708.04249 [quant-ph] (2017).

  9. N. Friis and M. Huber, Precision and Work Fluctuations in Gaussian Battery Charging, e-print arXiv:1708.00749 [quant-ph] (2017).

  10. S. Hangl, V. Dunjko, H. J. Briegel, and J. Piater, Skill Learning by Autonomous Robotic Playing using Active Learning and Creativity, e-print arXiv:1706.08560[cs.RO] (2017).

  11. F. Fröwis, P. Sekatski, W. Dür, N. Gisin, and N. Sangouard, Macroscopic quantum states: measures, fragility and implementations, e-print arXiv:1706.06173[quant-ph] (2017).

  12. A. A. Melnikov, H. Poulsen Nautrup, M. Krenn, V. Dunjko, M. Tiersch, A. Zeilinger, and H. J. Briegel, Active learning machine learns to create new quantum experiments, e-print arXiv:1706.00868 [quant-ph] (2017).

  13. M. Skotiniotis, W. Dür, and P. Sekatski, Macroscopic superpositions require tremendous measurement devices, e-print arXiv:1705.07053 [quant-ph] (2017).

  14. M. Zwerger, A. Pirker, V. Dunjko, H. J. Briegel, and W. Dür, Long-range big quantum-data transmission, e-print arXiv:1705.02174 [quant-ph] (2017).

  15. K. Schwaiger and B. Kraus, Relations between bipartite entanglement measures, e-print arXiv:1701.08679 [quant-ph] (2017).


[ 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 ]


Journal Articles

  1. W. L. Boyajian, M. Skotiniotis, W. Dür, and B. Kraus, Compressed quantum metrology for the Ising Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. A 94, 062326 (2016) [arXiv:1608.02620].

  2. C. Spee, J. I. de Vicente, and B. Kraus, Few-body entanglement manipulation, in: Quantum [Un]Speakables II, edited by R. Bertlmann and A. Zeilinger (Springer, 2017), pp. 365-380 [arXiv:1504.02643].

  3. J. Minář, P. Sekatski and N. Sangouard, Bounding quantum-gravity-inspired decoherence using atom interferometryPhys. Rev. A 94, 062111 (2016) [arXiv:1604.07810].

  4. E. G. Brown, N. Friis, and M. Huber, Passivity and practical work extraction using Gaussian operations, New J. Phys. 18, 113028 (2016) [arXiv:1608.04977].

  5. J. Wallnöfer, M. Zwerger, C. Muschik, N. Sangouard, and W. Dür, Two-dimensional quantum repeaters, Phys. Rev. A 94, 052307 (2016) [arXiv:1604.05352].

  6. H. J. Briegel, Versatile cluster entangled light, Science 354, 416 (2016).

  7. V. Dunjko, J. M. Taylor, and H. J. Briegel, Quantum-Enhanced Machine Learning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 130501 (2016) [arXiv:1610.08251 and arXiv:1507.08482].

  8. P. Sekatski, M. Skotiniotis, and W. Dür, Dynamical decoupling leads to improved scaling in noisy quantum metrology, New J. Phys. 18, 073034 (2016) [arXiv:1512.07476].

  9. N. Friis, Unlocking fermionic mode entanglement, New J. Phys. 18, 061001 (2016) [Perspective article on Dasenbrook et al., New J. Phys. 18, 043036 (2016)].

  10. A. Makmal, A. A. Melnikov, V. Dunjko, and H. J. Briegel, Meta-learning within Projective Simulation, IEEE Access 4, 2110 (2016) [arXiv:1602.08017].

  11. C. Spee, J. I. de Vicente, and B. Kraus, The maximally entangled set of 4-qubit states, J. Math. Phys. 57, 052201 (2016) [arXiv:1510.09164].

  12. V. Caprara Vivoli, P. Sekatski, and N. Sangouard, What does it take to detect entanglement with the human eye? Optica 3, 473 (2016) [arXiv:1602.01907].

  13. N. Friis, M. Huber, and M. Perarnau-Llobet, Energetics of correlations in interacting systems, Phys. Rev. E 93, 042135 (2016) [arXiv:1511.08654].

  14. D. Orsucci, M. Tiersch, and H. J. Briegel, Estimation of coherent error sources from stabilizer measurements, Phys. Rev. A 93, 042303 (2016) [arXiv:1512.07083].

  15. S. Barz, V. Dunjko, F. Schlederer, M. Moore, E. Kashefi, and I.A. Walmsley, Enhanced delegated computing using coherencePhys. Rev. A 93, 032339 (2016) [arXiv:1501.06730].

  16. M. Ho, A. Lafont, N. Sangouard, and P. Sekatski, Probing wave function collapse models with a classically driven mechanical oscillator, New J. Phys. 18, 033025 (2016) [arXiv:1504.00790].

  17. M. Zwerger, H. J. Briegel, and W. Dür, Measurement-based Quantum Communication, Appl. Phys. B 122, 50 (2016) [arXiv:1506.00985].

  18. N. Friis, Reasonable fermionic quantum information theories require relativity, New J. Phys. 18, 033014 (2016) [arXiv:1502.04476].

  19. F. Fröwis, P. Sekatski, and W. Dür, Detecting large quantum Fisher information with measurement precision, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 090801 (2016)  [arXiv:1509.03334].

  20. A. Makmal, M. Tiersch, C. Ganahl, and H. J. Briegel, Quantum walks on embedded hypercubes: Non-symmetric and non-local casesPhys. Rev. A 93, 022322 (2016) [arXiv:1510.08388].

  21. M. Hebenstreit, C. Spee, and B. Kraus, Maximally entangled set of tripartite qutrit states and pure state separable transformations which are not possible via local operations and classical communication, Phys. Rev. A 93, 012339 (2016) [arXiv:1511.03158].

  22. R. J. Donaldson, R. J. Collins, K. Kleczkowska, R. Amiri, P. Wallden, V. Dunjko, J. Jeffers, E. Andersson, and G. S. Buller, Experimental demonstration of kilometer-range quantum digital signaturesPhys. Rev. A 93, 012329 (2016) [arXiv:1509.07827].

  23. V. Dunjko, T. Kapourniotis, and E. Kashefi, Quantum-enhanced Secure Delegated Classical Computing, Quant. Inf. Comput. 16, 61 (2016) [arXiv:1405.4558].


  1. V. Dunjko and E. Kashefi, Blind quantum computing with two almost identical states, e-print arXiv:1604.01586 [quant-ph] (2016).

  2. J. Clausen and H. J. Briegel, Quantum machine learning with glow for episodic tasks and decision games, e-print arXiv:1601.07358 [quant-ph] (2016).

  3. J. Minář, P. Sekatski, R. Stevenson, and N. Sangouard, Testing unconventional decoherence models with atoms in optical lattices, e-print arXiv:1601.05381[quant-ph] (2016).


[ 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 ]


Journal Articles

  1. D. Sauerwein, K. Schwaiger, M. Cuquet, J. I. de Vicente, and B. Kraus, Source and accessible entanglement of few-body systemsPhys. Rev. A 92, 062340 (2015)  [arXiv:1508.02524].

  2. N. Friis, A. A. Melnikov, G. Kirchmair, and H. J. Briegel, Coherent controlization using superconducting qubits, Sci. Rep. 5, 18036 (2015) [arXiv:1508.00447].

  3. K. Schwaiger, D. Sauerwein, M. Cuquet, J. I. de Vicente, and B. Kraus, Operational multipartite entanglement measures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 150502 (2015) [arXiv:1503.00615].

  4. E. Oudot, P. Sekatski, F. Fröwis, N. Gisin, and N. Sangouard, Two-mode squeezed states as Schrödinger cat-like states, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 32, 2190 (2015) [arXiv:1410.8421].

  5. W. L. Boyajian and B. Kraus, Compressed simulation of thermal and excited states of the 1-D XY-model, Phys. Rev. A 92, 032323 (2015) [arXiv:1506.06894].

  6. P. Sekatski, M. Skotiniotis, and W. Dür, No-signaling bounds for quantum cloning and metrology, Phys. Rev. A 92, 022355 (2015) [arXiv:1412.3361].

  7. M. Tiersch, E. J. Ganahl, and H. J. Briegel, Adaptive quantum computation in changing environments using projective simulation, Sci. Rep. 5, 12874 (2015) [arXiv:1407.1535].

  8. M. Skotiniotis, F. Fröwis, W. Dür, and B. Kraus, Algebraic metrology: Pretty good states and bounds, Phys. Rev. A 92, 022323 (2015) [arXiv:1409.2316].

  9. N. Friis, M. Skotiniotis, I. Fuentes, and W. Dür, Heisenberg scaling in Gaussian quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. A 92, 022106 (2015) [arXiv:1502.07654].

  10. H. J. Briegel and T. Müller, A chance for attributable agency, Minds Mach. 25, 261 (2015) [philsci-archive:10349].

  11. M. Skotiniotis, P. Sekatski, and W. Dür, Quantum metrology for the Ising Hamiltonian with transverse magnetic field, New J. Phys. 17, 073032 (2015)  [arXiv:1502.06459].

  12. V. Dunjko and H. J. Briegel, Quantum mixing of Markov chains for special distributions, New J. Phys. 17, 073004 (2015) [arXiv:1502.05511].

  13. P. Wallden, V. Dunjko, A. Kent, and E. Andersson, Quantum digital signatures with quantum key distribution components, Phys. Rev. A 91, 042304 (2015)  [arXiv:1403.5551].

  14. W. Dür, P. Sekatski, and M. Skotiniotis, Deterministic Superreplication of One-Parameter Unitary Transformations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 120503 (2015) [arXiv:1410.6008].

  15. D. E. Bruschi, M. Perarnau-Llobet, N. Friis, K. V. Hovhannisyan, and M. Huber, The thermodynamics of creating correlations: Limitations and optimal protocols, Phys. Rev. E 91, 032118 (2015) [arXiv:1409.4647].

  16. V. Caprara Vivoli, P. Sekatski, J.-D. Bancal, C. C. W. Lim, A. Martin, R. T. Thew, H. Zbinden, N. Gisin, and N. Sangouard, Comparing different approaches for generating random numbers device-independently using a photon pair source, New J. Phys. 17, 023023 (2015) [arXiv:1409.8051].

  17. V. Dunjko, N. Friis, and H. J. Briegel, Quantum-enhanced deliberation of learning agents using trapped ions, New J. Phys. 17, 023006 (2015) [arXiv:1407.2830].

  18. J. Mautner, A. Makmal, D. Manzano, M. Tiersch, and H. J. Briegel, Projective simulation for classical learning agents: a comprehensive investigation, New Gener. Comput. 33, 69 (2015) [arXiv:1305.1578].

  19. V. Caprara Vivoli, P. Sekatski, J.-D. Bancal, C. C. W. Lim, B. G. Christensen, A. Martin, R. T. Thew, H. Zbinden, N. Gisin, and N. Sangouard, Challenging preconceptions about Bell tests with photon pairs, Phys. Rev. A 91, 012107 (2015) [arXiv:1405.1939].


  1. T. Kapourniotis, V. Dunjko, and E. Kashefi, On optimising quantum communication in verifiable quantum computing, e-print arXiv:1506.06943 [quant-ph] (2015).

  2. V. Dunjko and H. J. Briegel, Sequential quantum mixing for slowly evolving sequences of Markov chains, e-print arXiv:1503.01334 [quant-ph] (2015).


[ 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 ]


Journal Articles

  1. H. J. Briegel and S. Popescu, A perspective on possible manifestations of entanglement in biological systems, in Quantum Effects in Biology, eds. M. Mohseni, Y. Omar, G. S. Engel, M. B. Plenio, Cambridge University Press (2014).

  2. W. Dür and S. Heusler, Visualization of the invisible: The Qubit as key to quantum physics, Phys. Teach. 52, 489 (2014).

  3. A. Makmal, M. Tiersch, V. Dunjko, and S. Wu, Entanglement of π-locally-maximally-entangleable states and the satisfiability problem, Phys. Rev. A 90, 042308 (2014) [arXiv:1405.7429].

  4. S. Barz, R. Vasconcelos, C. Greganti, M. Zwerger, W. Dür, H. J. Briegel, and P. Walther, Demonstrating elements of measurement-based quantum error correction, Phys. Rev. A 90, 042302 (2014) [arXiv:1308.5209].

  5. P. Sekatski, N. Gisin, and N. Sangouard, How difficult it is to prove the quantumness of macroscropic states? Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 090403 (2014) [arXiv:1402.2542].

  6. A. A. Melnikov, A. Makmal, and H. J. Briegel, Projective simulation applied to the grid-world and the mountain-car problem, Artif. Intell. Res. 3 (3), 24 (2014) [arXiv:1405.5459].

  7. A. Makmal, M. Zhu, D. Manzano, M. Tiersch, and H. J. Briegel, Quantum walks on embedded hypercubes, Phys. Rev. A 90, 022314 (2014) [arXiv:1309.5253].

  8. J. Clausen, G. G. Guerreschi, M. Tiersch, and H. J. Briegel, Multiple re-encounter approach to radical pair reactions and the role of nonlinear master equations, J. Chem. Phys. 141, 054107 (2014) [arXiv:1310.6194].

  9. O. Gühne, M. Cuquet, F. E. S. Steinhoff, T. Moroder, M. Rossi, D. Bruß, B. Kraus, and C. Macchiavello, Entanglement and nonclassical properties of hypergraph states, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 335303 (2014) [arXiv:1404.6492].

  10. F. Fröwis, M. Skotiniotis, B. Kraus, and W. Dür, Optimal quantum states for frequency estimation, New J. Phys. 16, 083010 (2014) [arXiv:1402.6946].

  11. M. Skotiniotis, B. Toloui, I. T. Durham, and B. C. Sanders, Quantum Resource Theory for Charge-Parity-Time Inversion, Phys. Rev. A 90, 012326 (2014) [arXiv:1405.2516].

  12. M. Zwerger, H. J. Briegel, and W. Dür, Robustness of hashing protocols for entanglement purification, Phys. Rev. A 90, 012314 (2014) [arXiv:1405.4207].

  13. G. Paparo, V. Dunjko, A. Makmal, M. A. Martin-Delgado, and H. J. Briegel, Quantum speed-up for active learning agents, Phys. Rev. X 4, 031002 (2014) [arXiv:1401.4997].

  14. M. Zwerger, H. J. Briegel, and W. Dür, Hybrid architecture for encoded measurement-based quantum computation, Sci. Rep. 4, 5364 (2014) [arXiv:1308.4561].

  15. N. Friis, V. Dunjko, W. Dür, and H. J. Briegel, Implementing quantum control for unknown subroutines, Phys. Rev. A 89, 030303(R) (2014) [arXiv:1401.8128].

  16. B. P. Lanyon, M. Zwerger, P. Jurcevic, C. Hempel, W. Dür, H. J. Briegel, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Experimental Violation of Multipartite Bell Inequalities with Trapped Ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 100403 (2014) [arXiv:1312.4810].

  17. P. Sekatski, M. Aspelmeyer, and N. Sangouard, Macroscopic Optomechanics from Displaced Single-Photon Entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 080502 (2014)  [arXiv:1401.2357].

  18. W. Dür, M. Skotiniotis, F. Fröwis, and B. Kraus, Improved quantum metrology using quantum error-correction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 080801 (2014) [arXiv:1310.3750].

  19. M. Stobińska, F. Töppel, P. Sekatski, and A. Buraczewski, Towards loophole-free Bell inequality test with preselected unsymmetrical singlet states of light, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022119 (2014) [arXiv:1304.7460].

  20. S. Weinfurtner, G. De las Cuevas, M. A. Martin-Delgado, and H. J. Briegel, Reducing space-time to binary information, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47,095301 (2014) [arXiv:1210.5182].

  21. G. Giedke and B. Kraus, Gaussian local unitary equivalence of n-mode Gaussian states and Gaussian transformations by local operations with classical communication, Phys. Rev. A 89, 012335 (2014) [arXiv:1311.0509].

  22. M. Van den Nest and W. Dür, Exponentially improved classical and quantum algorithms for three-body Ising models, Phys. Rev. A 89, 012334 (2014) [arXiv:1304.2879].

  23. P. Sekatski, N. Sangouard, and N. Gisin, The size of quantum superpositions as measured with "classical" detectors, Phys. Rev. A 89, 012116 (2014)  [arXiv:1306.0843].


  1. J. Combes, C. Ferrie, C. Cesare, M. Tiersch, G. J. Milburn, H. J. Briegel, and C. M. Caves, In-situ characterization of quantum devices with error correction, e-print arXiv:1405.5656 [quant-ph] (2014).

  2. T. Müller and H. J. Briegel, Stochastic libertarianism: How to maintain integrity in action without determinism, Preprint philsci-archive:10223 (2014).


 [ 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 ]


Journal Articles

  1. S. N. Filippov, A. A. Melnikov, and M. Ziman, Dissociation and annihilation of multipartite entanglement structure in dissipative quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 88, 062328 (2013) [arXiv:1310.4790]. 

  2. M. Tiersch, G. G. Guerreschi, J. Clausen, and H. J. Briegel, Approaches to Measuring Entanglement in Chemical Magnetometers, J. Phys. Chem. A 118, 13 (2013)  [arXiv:1308.5172].

  3. W. L. Boyajian, V. Murg, and B. Kraus, Compressed Simulation of evolutions of the XY-model, Phys. Rev. A 88, 052329 (2013) [arXiv:1305.5895].

  4. C. Spengler and B. Kraus, Graph-state formalism for mutually unbiased bases, Phys. Rev. A 88, 052323 (2013) [arXiv:1309.6557].

  5. B. P. Lanyon, P. Jurcevic, M. Zwerger, C. Hempel, E. A. Martinez, W. Dür, H. J. Briegel, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Measurement-Based Quantum Computation with Trapped Ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 210501 (2013) [arXiv:1308.5102].

  6. D. E. Bruschi, N. Friis, I. Fuentes, and S. Weinfurtner, On the robustness of entanglement in analogue gravity systems, New J. Phys. 15, 113016 (2013) [arXiv:1305.3867].

  7. F. Fröwis, M. van den Nest, and W. Dür, Certifiability criterion for large-scale quantum systems, New J. Phys. 15, 113011 (2013) [arXiv:1306.0370].

  8. F. Kesting, F. Fröwis, and W. Dür, Effective noise channels for encoded quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 88, 042305 (2013) [arXiv:1306.1738].

  9. J. I. de Vicente, C. Spee, and B. Kraus, The maximally entangled set of multipartite quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 110502 (2013) [arXiv:1305.7398].

  10. H. J. Briegel and S. Popescu, Intra-molecular refrigeration in enzymes, Proc. R. Soc. A 469, 20110290 (2013) [arXiv:0912.2365].

  11. C. Spee, J. I. de Vicente, and B. Kraus, Remote entanglement preparation, Phys. Rev. A 88, 010305(R) (2013) [arXiv:1302.2471].

  12. M. Skotiniotis, B. Toloui, I. T. Durham, and B. C. Sanders, Quantum frameness for Charge-Parity-Time inversion symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 020504 (2013) [arXiv:1306.6114].

  13. M. Zwerger, H. J. Briegel, and W. Dür, Universal and Optimal Error Thresholds for Measurement-Based Entanglement Purification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 260503 (2013) [arXiv:1303.2852].

  14. G. G. Guerreschi, M. Tiersch, U. Steiner, and H. J. Briegel, Optical switching of radical pair conformation enhances magnetic sensitivity, Chem. Phys. Lett. 572, 106 (2013) [arXiv:1206.1280].

  15. M. Skotiniotis, W. Dür, and B. Kraus, Efficient quantum communication under collective noise, Quant. Inf. Comp. 13, 0290 (2013) [arXiv:1204.0891].

  16. D. Manzano, Quantum transport in quantum networks and photosynthetic complexes at the steady state, PLoS ONE 8, e57041 (2013) [arXiv:1206.2524].

  17. V. Nebendahl and W. Dür, Improved numerical methods for innite spin chains with long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. B 87, 075413 (2013) [arXiv:1205.2674].

  18. M. Tiersch, F. de Melo, and A. Buchleitner, Universality in open system entanglement dynamics, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 46, 085301 (2013) [arXiv:0810.2506].

  19. C. Song, T. Rohmer, M. Tiersch, J. Zaanen, J. Hughes, and J. Matysik, Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy to Probe Photoactivation in Canonical Phytochromes, Photochemistry and Photobiology 89, 259 (2013).

  20. T. Carle, B. Kraus, W. Dür, and J. I. de Vicente, Purification to Locally Maximally Entangleable States, Phys. Rev. A 87, 012328 (2013) [arXiv:1208.2553].

  21. A. Asadian, D. Manzano, M. Tiersch, and H. J. Briegel, Heat transport through lattices of quantum harmonic oscillators in arbitrary dimensions, Phys. Rev. E 87, 012109 (2013) [arXiv:1204.0904].


[ 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 ]


Journal Articles

  1. D. Manzano, M. Tiersch, A. Asadian, and H. J. Briegel, Quantum transport efficiency and Fourier's law,  Phys. Rev. E 86, 061118 (2012) [arXiv:1112.2839].

  2.  D. Manzano, Statistical measures of complexity for quantum systems with continuous variables, Physica A 391, 6238 (2012) [arXiv:1105.0628].

  3. F. Fröwis and W. Dür, Are cloned quantum states macroscopic? Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 170401 (2012) [arXiv:1203.0319].

  4. F. Fröwis and W. Dür, Measures of macroscopicity for quantum spin systems, New J. Phys. 14, 093039 (2012) [arXiv:1205.3048].

  5. M. C. Tichy, M. Tiersch, F. Mintert, and A. Buchleitner, Many-particle interference beyond many-boson and many-fermion statistics, New J. Phys. 14, 093015 (2012) [arXiv:1204.5588].

  6. M. Tiersch and H. J. Briegel, Decoherence in the chemical compass: The role of decoherence for avian magnetoreception, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 370, 4517 (2012) [arXiv:1204.4179].

  7. M. Tiersch, S. Popescu, and H. J. Briegel, A critical view on transport and entanglement in models of photosynthesis, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 370, 3771 (2012)  [arXiv:1104.3883].

  8. M. Zwerger, W. Dür, and H. J. Briegel, Measurement-based quantum repeaters, Phys. Rev. A 85, 062326 (2012) [arXiv:1204.2178].

  9. G. G. Guerreschi, J. Cai, S. Popescu, and H. J. Briegel, Persistent dynamic entanglement from classical motion: how bio-molecular machines can generate nontrivial quantum states, New J. Phys. 14, 053043 (2012) [arXiv:1111.2126].

  10. F. Fröwis, Kind of entanglement that speeds up quantum evolution, Phys. Rev. A 85, 052127 (2012) [arXiv:1204.1212].

  11. F. Fröwis and W. Dür, Stability of encoded macroscopic quantum superpositions, Phys. Rev. A 85, 052329 (2012) [arXiv:1201.2184].

  12. H. J. Briegel and G. De las Cuevas, Projective simulation for artificial intelligence, Sci. Rep. 2, 400 (2012) [arXiv:1104.3787].

  13. J. Clausen, G. Bensky, and G. Kurizki, Task-optimized control of open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 85, 052105 (2012) [arXiv:1111.2847].

  14. M. Tiersch, U. Steiner, S. Popescu, and H. J. Briegel, Open Quantum System Approach to the Modeling of Spin Recombination Reactions, J. Phys. Chem. A 116, 4020 (2012) [arXiv:1204.4634].

  15. T. Moroder, and O. Gittsovich, Calibration robust entanglement detection beyond Bell inequalities, Phys. Rev. A 85, 032301 (2012) [arXiv:1111.5874].

  16. J. I. de Vicente, T. Carle, C. Streitberger, and B. Kraus, Complete set of operational measures for the characterization of 3-qubit entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 060501 (2012) [arXiv:1106.4774].


 [ 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 ]